![]() Rulers in Rome began to take control of Israel during the first century B.C. Joseph, given that it dates to after the disuse of the house and localized quarrying in the first century."Īrchaeologists also discovered a number of sites nearby that hold clues as to what Nazareth was like in Jesus' time. "However, it is unlikely to be the actual tomb of St. Joseph,' and it was certainly venerated in the Crusader period, so perhaps they thought it was the tomb of St. "The tomb cutting through the house is today commonly called 'the Tomb of St. The tomb that cuts through the house was also venerated as being that of Joseph, the husband of the Virgin Mary. 670 by abbot Adomnàn of the Scottish island monastery at Iona, said to be based on a pilgrimage to Nazareth made by the Frankish bishop Arculf, mentions a church "where once there was the house in which the Lord was nourished in his infancy" (according to a translation of Adomnàn’s writing by James Rose Macpherson). In addition to the archaeological evidence, a text written in A.D. "Both the tombs and the house were decorated with mosaics in the Byzantine period, suggesting that they were of special importance, and possibly venerated," he wrote. "Great efforts had been made to encompass the remains of this building within the vaulted cellars of both the Byzantine and Crusader churches, so that it was thereafter protected," he said. The fact that the house was protected explains its "excellent preservation," Dark wrote. It was rebuilt in the 12th century, when Crusaders were in control of the area, only to be burnt down in the 13th century, Dark said. Two tombs (now empty) were constructed beside the abandoned house, with the forecourt of one of the tombs cutting through the house, the researchers said.Ĭenturies after Jesus' time, the Church of the Nutrition was built around this house and the two adjacent tombs, but the church fell into disuse in the eighth century. After that, the area was used for quarrying and then later in the first century it was reused as a burial ground. Just inside the surviving doorway, earlier excavations had revealed part of its original chalk floor."ĭark and his colleagues found that the house was abandoned at some point during the first century. Another had a stairway rising adjacent to one of its walls. "One, with its doorway, survived to its full height. "The structure included a series of rooms," he wrote. The first-century house "had been constructed by cutting back a limestone hillside as it sloped toward the wadi (valley) below, leaving carefully smoothed freestanding rock walls, to which stone-built walls were added," Dark wrote in a Biblical Archaeology Review article. If a Jewish family lived here it would support the idea that this could have been Jesus' house. The limestone vessels suggest a Jewish family lived in the house, because Jewish beliefs held that limestone could not become impure. The artifacts found in the first-century house include broken cooking pots, a spindle whorl (used in spinning thread) and limestone vessels, suggesting possibly a family lived there, the archaeologists said. Dark and the project's other archaeologists surveyed the site, and by combining their findings, a new analysis of Senès' findings, notes from the nuns' earlier excavations and other information, they reconstructed the development of the site from the first century to the present. In 2006, the nuns granted the Nazareth Archaeological Project full access to the site, including Senès drawings and notes, which they had carefully stored. His work was mostly unpublished and so it was largely unknown to anyone but the nuns and the people who visited their convent. Senès recorded in great detail the structures the nuns had exposed. ![]() The nuns' excavations of Jesus' possible home in the 1880s were followed up in 1936, when Jesuit priest Henri Senès, who was an architect before becoming a priest, visited the site, according to Dark. (The other house was discovered in 2009 and is not thought to be where Jesus grew up.) However in the last few years, archaeologists have identified two first-century houses in this town. Until recently few archaeological remains that date to the first century were known from Nazareth and those mostly consisted of tombs. This evidence suggests that both the Byzantines and Crusaders believed that this was the home where Jesus was brought up, Dark said. Crusaders who ventured into the Holy Land in the 12th century fixed up the church after it fell into disrepair.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |